L'Analisi Linguistica e Letteraria

Year 29 No. 3 (2021): Issue 3/2021
Articles

Phonological wordhood issues in Guro (South Mande)

PDF
  • Natalia Kuznetsova
Natalia Kuznetsova
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore
Categories

Published 01/13/2022

Keywords

  • Guro,
  • foot,
  • wordhood,
  • prosodic hierarchy,
  • tonal morphology

How to Cite

Kuznetsova, N. (2022). Phonological wordhood issues in Guro (South Mande). L’Analisi Linguistica E Letteraria, 29(3). Retrieved from https://www.analisilinguisticaeletteraria.eu/index.php/ojs/article/view/452

Copyright (c) 2022 L'Analisi Linguistica e Letteraria

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Abstract

Guro, a richly tonal language of Côte d’Ivoir, presents some challenges for the Match Theory (a recent development of the theories of Prosodic Hierarchy) which implies a strict correspondence between prosodic and morphosyntactic units starting from the lexical level. Guro exhibits a ‘featural’ foot, which is not based on metrical stress. However, this is only an emerging prosodic domain: the language is characterised by ongoing intensive ‘footisation’ and monosyllabification processes which constantly change the shapes of morphosyntactic units. The degree of footisation depends on the degree of idiomaticity of a particular morphosyntactic construction, along a continuum from morpheme combinations to free phrases, i.e. essentially on a semantic parameter. There is also another prosodic domain relevant at the lexical level: the domain of morphonological tonal change. As shown by example of di- and trisyllabic nouns, the two prosodic domains tend to be aligned with each other and with the morphosyntactic word, but this is not a strict rule.

PDF

References

  1. Selkirk, E., ‘On prosodic structure and its relation to syntactic structure’, in T. Fretheim (ed.), Nordic Prosody II: Papers from a symposium, (Trondheim: TAPIR, 1981), pp. 111–40
  2. Selkirk, E., ‘The prosodic structure of function words’, in J. L. Morgan, K. Demuth (eds.), Signal to syntax: Bootstrapping from speech to grammar in early acquisition, (New York: Psychology Press, 1996)
  3. Nespor, M. and I. Vogel, Prosodic phonology, (Foris Publications, 1986)
  4. Kasevič, V. B., Elementy obš’ej lingvistiki, (Nauka; Glavnaja redakcija vostočnoj literatury, 1977)
  5. Kasevič, V. B., Fonologicheskie problemy obshchego i vostochnogo yazykoznaniya, (Nauka; Glavnaja redakcija vostočnoj literatury, 1983)
  6. Kuz’menko, J. K., Fonologičeskaja evol’ucija germanskih jazykov, (Nauka; Akademija nauk SSSR; Institut jazykoznanija, Leningradskoje otdelenije, 1991)
  7. Mel’čuk, I. A., Kurs obš’ej morfologii. Tom 3: Čast’ 3: Morfologičeskie sredstva, Čast’ 4: Morfologičeskie sintaktiki, (Jazyki Russkoj Kul’tury, 2000), vol. iii
  8. Selkirk, E., ‘The syntax-phonology interface’, in J. A. Goldsmith, J. Riggle, A. C. L. Yu (eds.), The handbook of phonological theory, (Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 2011), pp. 435–85
  9. Elfner, E., ‘The syntax-prosody interface: current theoretical approaches and outstanding questions’, Linguistics Vanguard, 4/1 (2018)
  10. Russell, K., ‘The “word” in two polysynthetic languages’, in T. A. Hall, U. Kleinhenz (eds.), Studies on the phonological word, (Amsterdam: Benjamins, 1999), pp. 203–21
  11. Bickel, B. and F. Zúñiga, ‘The “word” in polysynthetic languages: phonological and syntactic challenges’, in M. Fortescue, M. Mithun, N. Evans (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Polysynthesis, (Oxford University Press, 2017), pp. 158–85
  12. Elfner, E., ‘Match theory and recursion below an above the word: Evidence from Tlingit’, Invited talk at ‘Recursivity in Phonology below and above the word’, (Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain, 2019)
  13. Schiering, R., B. Bickel, and K. A. Hildebrandt, ‘The prosodic word is not universal, but emergent’, Journal of Linguistics, 46/3 (2010), 657–709
  14. Kuznetsova, N., ‘Le status fonctionnel du pied phonologique en gouro’, Mandenkan, 43 (2007), 13–45
  15. Green, C., ‘The foot domain in Bambara’, Language, 91/1 (2015), e1–26
  16. Vydrin, V., ‘Vowel elision and reduction in Bambara’, Italian Journal of Linguistics, 32/1 (2020), 101–22
  17. Le Saout, J., Notes sur la phonologie du Gouro (zone de Zuénoula), (C.E.P.L.A.N., 1979)
  18. Grégoire, H.-C., Etude de la langue gouro (Côte-d’Ivoire), (Université d’Abidjan, Institut de linguistique appliquée, 1976)
  19. Benoist, J.-P., Dictionnaire gouro-français, (1977)
  20. Kuznecova, N. V. and O. V. Kuznecova, ‘Guro jazyk’, in A. A. Kibrik, V. F. Vydrin (eds.), Jazyki mira: Jazyki mande, (Sankt-Peterburg: Nestor-Istorija; Rossijskaja akademija nauk, Institut jazykoznanija, 2017), pp. 765–877
  21. Creissels, D., ‘A propos de la tonologie du bambara: réalisations tonales, système tonal et la modalité nominale “definie”’, Afrique et Langage, 9 (1978), 5–70
  22. Green, C., ‘Compacité tonale and the Bamana prosodic word domain’, Indiana University Linguistics Club Online Working Papers 11, (Bloomington, IN: IULC Publications, 2011)
  23. Sproat, R., ‘Bracketing paradoxes, cliticization and other topics: The mapping between syntactic and phonological structure’, in M. Everaert, A. Evers, R. Huybregts, M. Trommelen (eds.), Morphology and modularity: In honour of Henk Schultink, (Dordrecht: Foris, 1988), pp. 339–60